Evaluating lay testimony is important in both civil and criminal justice. For example, whether a witness is reliable can make the difference between conviction and acquittal of a defendant, or a person being granted leave to remain rather than facing deportation. However, It is difficult to determine accurately whether a person providing testimony is being truthful and is likely to be accurate in their assessments.

We are working on a large-scale evaluation of testimony evaluation, that examines the basic science of testimony evaluation and translates scientific research into practical and normatively appropriate legal procedure and best-practice guidelines.

Social Metamemory
Find out more
Memory Accuracy Evaluation
Find out more
Truth Judgments
Find out more
Evidence Based Instructions
Find out more


For more information on our work on testimony evaluation, please get in touch via the contact us page.